피고인은 2017. 7. 16. 경 인터넷 C에 접속하여 누구든지 볼 수 있는 게시 글 란에 비방할 목적으로, 같이 C 활동을 하는 사람들이라면 누구나 피해자를 지칭하는 것임을 알 수 있는 “ 두 얼굴의 애국 우파 놈, 무지 착한 애국 자인 냥 양심 바르고 정의 파라고 본인 입으로 떠들던 인간이 한 여성 우파와 싸워 차단당함! 제가 그 여성 편 든다고.. 저까지 협박하던 두 얼굴의 인간이.. 미국에서 보낸 후원금을 인 마이 포켓하고 거짓 인증 샷 찍어 올린 사건! 지금 C 우파들 .. 멘 붕 !!” 이라고 기재하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through the information and communications network.

2. Determination

A. We examine whether the part “a woman’s friend and a friended one is false or not.”

Upon examining the police statement protocol on B, B stated that there is no dispute with female members working together.

However, at the time of Defendant’s submission No. 1, B sent warning around June 22, 2017.

저를 원망하며.. 차단을.. 이제 두고 뵈서.. 낱낱이 공개할 겁니다.

A woman who is lifeed and has not been able to be buried in C. Such woman shall be frighten to be buried in C.

I think as soon as possible, and if I would like to block E’s thickness. I would like to block it.

No superior shall be the author

“I point out that I point out that B’s comments on SNS are wrong, and that I point out that I point out the wrong points.

Mescopic understanding and sufficient understanding, but it is necessary to cut off unilaterally the low unilaterally.

Then, how to do so

Therefore, it makes the last overlap to prevent the quality of sugar.

6. As stated in the Dissenting Opinion, the following facts may be recognized:

According to the above facts of recognition, it is true that B was dissatisfied with the women's friendship, and that the women's blocking B is true.