beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.02.02 2015가단76206

보험에관한 소송

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 17, 2011, the Plaintiff guaranteed the Defendant’s disease hospitalization expenses, etc. between the Defendant’s mother and B as the insured.

1. Conclusion of the stated insurance contract

(hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). Since then, the contractor of the instant insurance contract was changed from B to the Defendant.

B. The Defendant was hospitalized for seven days from March 27, 201 to April 2, 2011, and was hospitalized for seven days from that time to March 11, 2015, as well as for 30 times in total and 536 days from that time to March 11, 2015.

2. The Plaintiff received hospitalized treatment at a hospital as indicated in the table of the Defendant’s medical treatment, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 19,297,000 insurance money to the insurance money under the instant insurance contract, but only sought reimbursement of KRW 18,847,00 as unjust enrichment, according to the instant insurance contract.

was paid by the Corporation.

C. Before and after the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, the details of the guaranteed insurance contract concluded by the Defendant as the insured were excluded from fire insurance, etc.

The details are as follows, and insurance money paid through this will reach KRW 196,268,804,000,000 for the confirmed amount.

Serial 58,860 B 30,00 per month insurance premium (won) for insurance of 10,000 customers of Nonghyup 1 on September 29, 2008: 40,000 (FF) : 52,000 single fire damage, 58,860 B : 30,000 AI Life, 244,450 B 30 B 1: 30,000,000 A. 30,000,000 A. 20,000,000 customers, and 30,000,000,000,000 customers: 50,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00