However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A. From November 24, 2012 to January 15, 2013, in the course of operating a manufacturing factory of counterfeit goods in Hanam-si B, C, upon request from C to make a stolen wall with the same shape of a forged trademark attached to the trademark registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (LOIS VITON), the forged trademark was sold to C by forming 1,00 a stolen wall with the trademark attached.

B. From November 24, 2012 to January 15, 2013, at manufacturing factories for counterfeit goods located in Hanam City B, a trademark registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (LOIS VITON) for the purpose of selling 700 bags with a forged trademark in the same shape as a trademark registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (LOIS VITON), 2,00 metal subsidiary materials, 2,00 metal subsidiary materials, and 2 gold-types.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C to infringe on the trademark right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects against Defendant C by the prosecution;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. A written appraisal;

1. Application of the statutes of the original trademark register;

1. Article 93 of the relevant Article of the Trademark Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant manufacturing a forged trademark is affixed and taking part in the crime, and there is a need for the corresponding punishment.

However, the suspended sentence is decided as ordered by the court in consideration of the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit a crime, that the defendant is divided, that only received a discretionary processing cost from C, and that the gains acquired from the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be significant, and that there is no record of the same kind of crime.