If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On February 13, 2014, around 14:47, the Defendant reported to 112 on the ground that he drinked alcohol within the D convenience points located C at the time of lighting, and presented the Defendant to the outside of the Defendant who saw the disturbance to drink within the convenience point by the police officer, G police officer at the scene, on February 13, 2014, and on February 13, 2014, G, a police officer assigned to the scene, the background and F of the E District belonging to the police officer at the scene, G, a police officer assigned to the scene, the Defendant: (a) whether the Defendant

The age also interfered with legitimate performance of official duties concerning the suppression and investigation of crimes by police officers, such as cutting off a brush, a brush, a brush to the face of G and assaulting the left clothes one time by walking the brush.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is not bad in light of the circumstances, and the crime of interference with the execution of official duties is highly likely to be strict.