In light of the relevant legal principles and records, it is reasonable for the court below to find the defendant not guilty of the changed facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal principles on infringement of service marks in violation of the Trademark Act and confusion of business entities in violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.