게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, 2 years of suspended execution and 80 hours of community service as declared by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment is based on the fact that the defendant is against his mistake, and there is no past history of punishment before and after the crime, but the period of operation of the game of this case is not small and considerable. The game room business using altered game products requires strict punishment because of serious harm to society, such as encouraging excessive speculative spirit to the general public and hindering sound labor consciousness, etc. In light of the circumstances of the defendant's assertion, the court below seems to have already determined the punishment in consideration of the circumstances of the defendant's assertion, and in full view of various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstance before and after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.