On November 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) told the victim B to “a mobile phone which needs to be calculated; (b) obtained a mobile phone from the victim’s mobile phone; and (c) entered the mobile merchandise settlement information into the victim’s computer information processing unit, which is the data processing unit of the victim’s mobile phone; and (d) made the victim’s mobile merchandise settlement information into the victim’s mobile merchandise coupon settlement information without authority; and (c) paid two copies of the 10,00 won note above the 30,000 won note; and (d) two copies of the 50,000 won note note note above the 50,00 won note note above the 1,00 won note; and (e) one, 1,30,000 won items merchandise coupon; and (e) one, 1,50,000 won items merchandise coupon 1,20,000 won note 1,110,000 won note ; and (e) settled profits equivalent to the Internet value of the merchandise.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on simple statements, details of coophones purchase, and response data;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act (the fraud by Use of Computer, etc.), the choice of imprisonment