However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 2, 2017, the Defendant, at around 17:10 on March 2, 2017, was boarding a taxi in the vicinity C in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, but did not pay the subsequent fees, left the taxi at the police box in the Southern Police Station E box in the same city, along with the taxi engineer.

Defendant 1 returned to the above taxi driver without any justifiable reason, called “I salking, salking, and salkeing h.h....” The Defendant 1 committed an act of blocking the passage of vehicles by going to the road before the police box was sent to the police box, and when the Defendant 1 moved from F to India to India, the Defendant 2 took two descendants of the above F’s chest, pushed the F’s wing part, and f’s wing part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the people's body and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the recommended sentencing criteria) of the suspended sentence;

1. Reference to the sentencing criteria - Scope of recommended sentences: The basic area (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) of Type 1 (In June to June).

2. Determination of sentence - The degree of violence is not serious, the recent 20 years has no record of crime, and the records and changes of the crime of this case are considered in light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and changes.