유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
A. On the ground that the Plaintiff’s claim was rejected.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.
The Plaintiff filed a request for review to the Defendant on June 16, 2015, but was dismissed on June 16, 2015, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee filed a request for reexamination to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but was dismissed on September 2
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The facts of recognition 1) As a result of the diagnosis of the deceased's medical history diagnosis (m) at the time of intensive examination of the deceased, the following results of the diagnosis of the deceased's medical history diagnosis (m) : 1/2 of F Hospital - F Hospital - F0 (m) on May 12 through 17, 2003 - 11- 9 of E Hospital 2/10 (m) on April 18 through 23, 2005 - 11- 9 of E Hospital 2/10 (m) on June 12, 2006 to June 17, 201; 2/10 (m) on January 11, 201 to 2/10 (m) on January 15, 2003 to 17, 201.
* Tbb. B. The details of the deceased’s health insurance benefits are as follows: - chronic pulmonary pulmonary disease (E Hospital) in detail from March 21, 2005 to October 8, 2013 - medical opinions on the deceased’s private individuals, etc. from May 29, 2014 to July 3, 2014, the deceased’s opinion at the Institute of Vocational pulmonary pulmonary Corruption (E Hospital) Research was confirmed to be the upper cancer of the Pyoric Baum for three months prior to the death, and it was inappropriate to expand the location of the deceased’s pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary Elimination on the day of death without any special change. The deceased’s opinion at the Institute of Vocational pulmonary pulmonary Maum on the day of death.