On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant of the primary facts charged and the primary facts charged, on the grounds that there is no proof of a crime, and determined that the Defendant was not guilty of the primary facts charged added by the lower court.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.