A. The punishment imposed by the lower court (three million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant was punished for a violation of the Road Act more than 20 times and there are many other kinds of records of punishment due to an unlicensed driving, and that there are many kinds of records of punishment due to other violent crimes, etc., the defendant's mistake and the defendant's fault are recognized. The defendant's argument is without merit, since considering various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is deemed proper, and it is deemed that the sentence imposed on the defendant is too heavy or too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant

3. According to the conclusion, each appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.