However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Co-principals of the defendant and D, "2016 Highest 3245"

1. Special larceny;

A. On April 2015, 2015, the Defendants and D had 3 cans and 10 cans and 15 cans and 1 cans in the display stand, which are located in the display stand, between G Dogs operated by the victim F in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and H, an employee of the Republic of Korea, in the second floor shop above the ground. Defendant A had 3 cans and 10 cans and 15 cans and 1 cans.

Accordingly, the Defendants, together with D, stolen the total amount of 30,000 won of the market price owned by the victim.

B. At around 22:00 on May 6, 2015, the Defendants and D discovered that the Victim K was drunk and locked on the front side of the J in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and D, they reported tobacco to the network while smoking, and Defendant A had access to the victim and caused the victim’s access to the victim, and Defendant B took out one of the fluences in the market price on which the Victim’s driver’s license, our card, and Samsung Card were located.

As a result, the Defendants stolen the property owned by the victim together with D.

C. Defendants and D around 04:30 on May 9, 2015, at the Mabrying site in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City L, D and Defendant B reported the network outside the male water surface room, and Defendant A had a cellular phone in Samsung 4 when the market price of the victim owned by the victim located adjacent to the victim, approaching the victim N in the male water surface room.

As a result, the Defendants stolen the property owned by the victim together with D.

2. On May 6, 2015, Defendants and D, who violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, presented the following as follows: (a) at the Pgarment store operated by the victim Egyd Co., Ltd. located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Co., Ltd., the Defendant’s violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act presented to the employees of the above clothes store with his name as if they were entitled

However, the facts are above.