beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.10.07 2013고단89

사기

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who was the representative director of C&C. The defendant, although he did not know of the fact that he had concluded the D Nowon datum and the event shop occupants contract, he would be able to recruit shop occupants who are able to use the D Nowon datum and give instructions to enter into the contract. On November 17, 2010, E, in receipt of the defendant's instructions, at the Seoul Metropolitan Business Office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, Inc., Ltd., to whom he received the defendant's instructions, will be able to commission the head to G from the D Nowon datum if he would be able to do so.

The phrase “assumed,” it received a total of KRW 59 million from G to December 14, 2010 from that time on the same date, from which he/she received KRW 7 million from G, from which he/she received a remittance of KRW 59 million from that time on five occasions by December 14, 2010.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, ① the Defendant is the C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) that he operated on November 17, 2010.

In the name of the complainant and the complainant, a consignment agreement which allows the complainant to establish a franchise store of the company from the D Nowon datum (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement of this case").

A. The Defendant entered into a short-term event transaction contract with H Co., Ltd. and C on November 19, 2010 with respect to the fact that the Defendant was permitted to establish a franchise store in D, and that C entered into a short-term event transaction contract with H Co., Ltd. on a short-term basis with which H Co., Ltd. may sell products in D, and entered into a short-term event transaction contract with I Co., Ltd. on December 3, 2013 with regard to D, and ③ the terms and conditions of the instant special agreement entered into a short-term event transaction contract with D with regard to D, etc. on a short-term basis; and ③ the instant special agreement entered into the instant contract stating that “on December 16, 2010, the C will return the down payment to the city that would not have been determined as D,” and “on the first priority shop occupants at the time of the occurrence of Nowon D/O”, and thus, the Defendant’s qualification for the instant contract is indicated as “D.”