beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.01.31 2018고단2801

119구조ㆍ구급에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, 22:30 on November 22, 2018, “A person who was injured” in front of the building C located in the Sungnam-gu Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Gyeonggi branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the Seoul branch of the first branch of the first branch of the first branch of the first branch of the first branch, and

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with emergency medical services of 119 first responders dispatched without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 28 and 13 (2) and (1) of the Act on 119 Rescue and Emergency Medical Services, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant of the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order is not to be less complicated in light of the nature of the crime committed by an emergency medical service worker who performs rescue operations and emergency medical services without any justifiable reason.

However, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, environment, character and conduct, motive and means of a crime, circumstances after a crime, etc., and the records and arguments of this case, such as the fact that the defendant is against nature, there is no violence, degree of violence, etc.