사기
The crimes listed in the [Attachment 1] No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant are two months of imprisonment, and the crimes listed in the [Attachment 1] No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Jeonju District Court on October 28, 2008 and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the same day, and was provisionally released on May 1, 2009 during the execution of the sentence in the Jeonju Prison.
5. 20. The parole period expired.
"2014 Highest 87"
1. On May 27, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of “E” entertainment tavern operated by the victim D in the Gyeonggi-gu World Trade Organization Co., Ltd., stating that “E will work from the day on which the victim was on which the victim’s 5.5 million won was paid in advance.”
However, even if the Defendant received a prepaid payment from the victim, the Defendant did not intend to work in the “E” entertainment tavern.
Nevertheless, the defendant received 5.5 million won as a prepaid payment from the victim.
"2014 Highest 113"
2. On August 5, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of “H” entertainment tavern operated by the victim G in the Gangwon-gun of Gangwon-do, the Defendant called “H” that “the victim will work from the day on which the victim’s right to pay 5,500,000 won in advance is located.”
However, even if the defendant received a prepaid payment from the victim, he did not intend to work at the above entertainment drinking house.
Nevertheless, the defendant was given 50,000 won from the victim, i.e., prepaid.
"2014 Highest 274"
3. The Defendant, along with I et al., conspiredd with I et al. to receive money under the pretext of prepaid money, as if he were to work in an entertainment tavern.
On January 4, 2008, the Defendant stated that “L” operated by the Victim K in the Chungcheongnam-gu J of Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, would be repaid to the victim with advance payment.
However, in fact, the defendant did not think of the actual work in the above multiples and did not have any property or income, so even if he received money under the name of advance payment, he did not have any intent or ability to complete payment according to the agreement.
As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and makes a prepayment from the victim's position.