However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 10, 2013, at around 23:15, the Defendant misleads the victim E (the 28-year-old) to the effect that the Defendant was taking one-time care of the victim E (the 28-year-old-old-old-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong (the 28-year-old-old-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu (the 28-year-old-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused, E, G, or F;

1. Each death diagnosis and written confirmation of hospitalization;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the liability of a defendant for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. is not less than the punishment of a defendant due to the crime in this case, the court shall comprehensively consider the following factors: (a) the defendant has committed all of his mistake, and is divided; (b) the defendant has yet to be aged and has no record of criminal punishment; (c) the defendant does not want to punish the defendant any longer; (d) the victim E and G have agreed with the victim F; (e) the victim E and G expressed their intention that the degree of each injury is relatively minor; and (e) the above victims expressed their intention that the defendant does not want to be punished to an investigative agency; and (e) other various sentencing conditions specified in the argument in this case, such as character, character, intelligence and environment, motive