수목등수거 및 토지인도
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) Attached appraisal maps 1, 21, 31, 41, 51, 51, among the 4767 square meters of land in Jeonnam-gun, Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun.
1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5-1 to 4 of evidence Nos. 5, the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the result of appraiser D’s survey, appraisal, and the purport of the whole pleadings as to the cause of the claim, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the land owned by the plaintiff; (b) the attached appraisal of the forest of this case owned by the plaintiff is the land owned by the plaintiff; (c) the attached appraisal of the land of this case, which is attached to 1, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61 and 1, are planted on the ground of 69 square meters in sequence, which are attached to 69 square meters in the part (b) of the land owned by the defendant, and the defendant is obligated to collect and deliver the land of this case to the plaintiff in sequence 1,221, 31, 31, 41, 51, 61, and 11.
2. The defendant's assertion and the judgment thereon
A. The defendant's assertion that the defendant's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' purchased the E' adjacent to the forest of this case, which was used as dry field at the time of use as dry field, and thereafter, the plaintiff purchased the remaining forest from F 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' and 's ''' 's 's ''
B. There is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's assertion that there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's assertion (as to "written rejection" submitted by the defendant, since the plaintiff denies the authenticity of the document, the burden of proving the authenticity of this document is to the defendant, who is the person who submitted it, but does not submit any material to acknowledge the authenticity of the formation of the document, and thus, the above written statement cannot
3. Thus, we conclude that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable and acceptable.