beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.03.30 2016고단1677 (2)

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and one year and two months, and one year, and the defendant D, E, and I shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and ten months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On July 7, 2016, Defendant B and Defendant C were sentenced to one year of imprisonment and two years of suspension of execution as a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. (remediation of commercial sex acts, etc.) in the support of the Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court on July 7, 2016, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 15, 2015. Defendant E was sentenced to four months of imprisonment by the same court on September 15, 2015 due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts (remediation of commercial sex acts, etc.).

1. Defendants A, B, and C

A. The Defendants conspired, from around June 2014 to July 2015, up to four households, including Y1510 and 1004, employed female employees including YY1510 and 1004, and “AB” on the Internet website, including “A” following the following: (a) sexual customers who reported the advertisement posted as described in the paragraph, and made a contact with the female employees, received KRW 150,000 won from the male customers and paid KRW 100,000,000 among them; and (b) made the female employees have sexual intercourse with the customer, thereby engaging in activities such as arranging sexual traffic.

B. The Defendants conspired to deposit advertising fees of KRW 500,00,000 in the accounts, such as AC, etc. at the time, place, and month, and placed an advertisement on the Internet website, such as AA and AD, stating pictures, introductions, prices, options, etc. of female employees, and made an advertisement on the business place where commercial sex acts or commercial sex acts are conducted.

2. Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D

A. From September 2014 to November 201 of the same year, the Defendants conspired in collusion with the Defendant, with the trade name of “AG” on the Internet website, such as “AA” after employing female employees, etc.,” and “AF,” etc., from September 1, 2014 to the above Y 1303, 1409, and 1201, the Defendants run a business by having female employees engage in sexual intercourse with customers, and by having female employees engage in sexual intercourse with customers.