beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고정1264

업무방해

Text

Defendant

A A A Fine of 500,000 won, Defendant B of 500,000 won, Defendant C of 50,000 won, and Defendant C of 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are members of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Association.

K Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association was established on June 24, 2010 as a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association established under the Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments for the Seongbuk-gu Seoul and 782 lot project implementation zone, and was authorized to implement the project on May 7, 2015, and on June 25, 2015, the procedures for application for apartment purchase were implemented through a general meeting of members.

The Defendants, etc., against the above redevelopment, organized the “K Emergency Countermeasures Committee” to promote the dissolution of the said redevelopment redevelopment project association, set up an office in front of the M in the same area, and performed activities against the members, such as demanding a dissolution consent form, refusing to apply for the above apartment, and withdrawing the application for parcelling-out.

1. Whether the Defendants, in collusion, conspired with the Defendants to interfere with the Defendants’ duties from September 18, 2015 to around 09:30 to 18:00, in the office of Seongbuk-gu Seoul N, the second floor, and the office of the K Housing Redevelopment and Development Project Association, “I believe how us are able to withdraw the partnership head, to withdraw the general director, to withdraw the executive director, to resign the management director, and to deny.”

It goes out of relief, such as “the head and executive officers of the partnership, immediately resign,” “the head and executive officers of the partnership, the director of the partnership, and the director of the partnership, shall not resign and be the head of the partnership,” and “the head and executive officers of the Domine shall trust and hold the house in trust of Domine son;

The president of the partnership interfered with the sale of apartment units, such as O, chief P, and Q, working in the partnership office by force, such as putting the head of the partnership, putting the head of the partnership, and drinking water.

2. From September 18, 2015, around September 18, 2015, Defendant D, Defendant F, and Defendant G jointly resisted that the victim O, the president of the partnership, left the office of the redevelopment and consolidation project partnership on the above K Housing on the grounds that Defendant D, Defendant F, and Defendant G left the room, and Defendant D left the room for her arm’s length and her finger.