beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.09 2016고단7353

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and fines for 20 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine for 4 million won.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner who operates commercial sex acts establishments under the trade name of Gangnam-gu C Officetel leased, "D", and Defendant B is a head of the office who has worked in the above business establishment.

Defendant

A from the end of May 2016 to June 9, 2016, from the said officetel 322, 705, and 816, A advertised the above business site on the Internet site, including “E,” and controlled the management of earnings. Defendant B received 130,000 won or 170,000 won from the purchase of sex from the above business site on June 2016, and provided guidance to F and G, etc. to have female employees, including F and G, do sexual intercourse with the purchase of sex.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against F and G;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 19(2)1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, imprisonment and fine concurrently

B. Defendant B: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, selection of fines (the short period of his participation as an employee, the absence of any record of criminal punishment, and confession and rebuttal, etc.)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant A) Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., a relatively short period of business, the size of business is not much significant, and the fact that no previous case exists, and confessions and reflects crimes);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above, each of the orders for provisional payment (defendants);