beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.05 2017고단8428

강제추행

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a publicly notified person who prepares for an administrative notice.

On September 16, 2017, around 02:00, the Defendant found that the Defendant entered a four-wayd ductal path in order to see the victim C (V, 17 years of age) in front of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and followed the said victim.

변을 보느라 쭈그려 앉아 있다가 일어서는 피해자에게 다가가 갑자기 양 팔로 피해자를 껴안고 피해자에게 “ 괜찮냐,

anywhere;

Doese Libi Liba

“............ the victim is frightened;

No. 100 Happed Happing

The friendly Gu shall be called as "Ilurgy" and the defendant shall be swelved with the swelve, off the swelve, and sweld with the swelves of the defendant, and the swelved with the swelves and clothes that are not properly located after the swelves and the swelves of the swelves of the victim, and the victim shall klved with the victim's hand, re-in the swelves of the victim, and then the victim

“In line with the intoxicated of the victim, the victim was able to walk the victim’s chest with his/her finger, walking the stove and walking the stove with his/her fingers and under his/her clothes, and the part of the victim was fluent.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent act against the victim by assault.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Application of statutes on on-site CCTV reporting;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. 수강명령 성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 제 16조 제 2 항 양형의 이유 불리한 정상 피고인은 새벽 2 시경 인적이 없는 골목길에서 혼자 있는 젊은 여성 주변을 맴돌다가 강제 추행에 이른 것으로 죄질이 좋지 않고, 추 행의 정도도 중하다.

The defendant, rather than recognizing the mistake of the principal, indicates the victim's identification at the time, and also the victim is good.