The defendant shall obtain money from the applicant F to the applicant F, 270,000 won.

2) The Defendant borrowed 3 million won from an employee who is not aware of the name of the aforementioned Lots loan, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the “1. A.” clause, and submitted the forged monetary consumption lending and borrowing agreement to the said employee by facsimile as if it were duly formed.

2. Forging private documents related to mobile phones and uttering of falsified investigation documents;

A. The Defendant, using a personal identification card issued in BX name, opened a mobile phone in the name of BX, and reselled the mobile phone to collect money.

On May 12, 2015, at a mobile phone agency with which it is difficult to ascertain the trade name located inCC at Suwon-si, the Defendant stated that “BX”, “CE”, “BZ”, and “BZ” in the column of address address column in the name of the customer requesting this agency via the CD operated by the said agency, the Defendant stated “BX”, “E”, “BZ”, and “BZ” in the name of the customer requesting this agency. The Defendant stated “BX”, “********,” and “BX” in the account number column, “BX” and “BX” in the account number column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a mobile phone subscription application in the name of BX, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant at the time and place indicated in the foregoing paragraph “2. A.,” and at the same time and place, received a cell phone opening from KT staff who knew of the forgery, and submitted the forged cell phone joining application by facsimile as if it were duly formed.

[2017 Highest 1037] On January 19, 2016, the Defendant posted a notice stating that he/she would purchase online shopping mall goods by accessing the Internet NAVV and the Korean bulletin board, using smartphones at Suwon-si’s mutual influence, and then, reported it to the victim CG, “The purchase of goods from the Internet shopping mall is 285,000 won.”