2. We examine the judgment of the court below, that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the fact that the amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case is not significant, but there are criminal records that the defendant has been punished several times due to the same crime, that is, the defendant is a criminal act during the repeated crime period, that the defendant committed each crime of Articles 2 and 3 as stated in the judgment of the court below without being aware of the fact that he was prosecuted as a crime of Article 1 of the judgment of the court below, that he committed the crime of Articles 2 and 3 in the judgment of the court below, that the victims' damage has not been completely recovered, that there is no change of circumstance that the court below and the punishment are different from the judgment of the court below, and that there is no other change of circumstance that the defendant's age, sex, environment, family status, economic situation, the background and motive leading to the crime of this case, and all other matters concerning the sentencing

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.