2. The fact that the Defendant appears to have recognized and reflected his mistake, that the degree of damage to the victims is relatively less severe, and that the Defendant agreed with the victim E is favorable.

However, in 206, the defendant has been punished for the same crime such as violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the Act on the Punishment of Violence, etc. at Night) in 2006 and the fine for violence in 2008, 1 year and 6 months of suspension of execution in 2009, 3 years and 6 months of imprisonment due to the crime of bodily injury in 2013 and 2 months of suspension of execution. The defendant injured the victim C in 2013 and was sentenced to 2 years of suspension of execution in 2 months of imprisonment. The execution of the sentence was terminated on January 2014 because the suspension of execution was revoked because the defendant was not subject to probation during the period of the suspension of execution. The defendant's unfavorable circumstances, such as the victim D and C, the age and character of the defendant, the environment, the circumstances of the crime in this case, the circumstances of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. are not recognized to be too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.