However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

The Defendants, C, D, and E conspired to report the birth of a child born between the Defendants of Vietnam, as if they were the children of E.

Accordingly, around October 2012, C prepared a copy of the birth certificate to the effect that “A shall prove the birth of a child between the deceased father and the deceased father in the Hayang-gu G in Gyeyang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-si, at around August 21, 2012, at his own house located in the Incheon Gyeyang-gu, and at around August 21, 2012, C signed and sealed the seals in the name of Hsan father, Ma and I prepared in advance.”

After that, around January 15, 2013, E submitted to the public official in charge as if he were a document prepared with a false report of birth, such as a false statement of birth, K, and mother, as if he was his own child, at the fung-si Office located in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, and the above system was operated after entering the reported details into the family relation registration system, which is the same electronic record as the original copy of the notarial deed, around that time.

In this way, in collusion with C, D, and E, the Defendants exercised one copy of the birth certificate in the name of the I, which is a private document concerning the certification of facts without authority, by forging it, and exercised it by having the public electronic record record record to record false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made in the first trial records with respect to D and E;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police investigation report (the application of Acts and subordinate statutes Nos. 54 through 56 of the evidence list);

1. The Defendants related to the relevant criminal facts: Articles 231 and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of use of private document), Articles 234, 231, and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of use of private document), Articles 228(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of use of false entry, such as public electronic records), Articles 229, 228(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of use of false entry, electronic records, etc.).