친환경농어업육성및유기식품등의관리ㆍ지원에관한법률위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the fact that the Defendant advertised and sold indigenous products which were not certified as environmentally friendly agricultural products from agricultural and fishery products by the certification agency designated by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, as if they were products certified as environmentally friendly agricultural products from agricultural and fishery products.
2. The lower court rendered a judgment of not guilty of the facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning.
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning of the lower court compared with the evidence examined, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable, and it did not err by misapprehending the facts, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.