A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 20,00,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

No person other than a medical person shall perform medical practice, and no medical person shall perform any medical practice other than that licensed.

Defendant

A is a doctor working for the Burology of the F Hospital in Seosan City E, and Defendant B is a radiation engineer working for the F Hospital image department.

On January 2, 2009, the Defendants confirmed the location of absence from the above G as a real-time consul (C-arm) installed in the external shock field, against the patient G, who was expected to receive the external shock shocking from the external shock rupture room at the above FF hospital first floor, Defendant B confirmed the return confirmation of the above G and physically fixed, and Defendant A confirmed the location of absence from the above G as a real-time consul (C-arm) installed in the external shock rupture.

Defendant A continued to order Defendant B to operate the said crushor and observe the patient’s progress, and Defendant B operated the said crushor and observed the progress of the said G in a mixed room.

In addition, the Defendants conspired to conduct a non-licensed medical practice more than 125 times from January 2, 2009 to August 27, 2009 in the following manner, as shown in the list of offenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, and J;

1. Some of the witness K’s legal statement;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against K and L in each prosecutor's protocol;

1. Each police statement made with respect to H, M, or N;

1. Each statement or confirmation of H, I, or K;

1. J's certificate of visit for on-site verification of the F hospital;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the F Hospital internal photographs, the head of the relevant hospital, a written opinion submission (F hospital), a notice of the decision on recovery of benefits for medical care, a written judgment (2014Nu993), a written judgment (2012 Guide 27688), a written judgment (F hospital, records 2/201 Guide 27688), a list of patients suffering from urology (record 1/48 Guide 48 Guide 48 Guide 201), a report on the investigation of patients suffering from urology (F hospital, etc.), a telephone report on patients suffering from urology, a report on the investigation of patients suffering from urology, and a report on the investigation (verification of the current fact of the National Health Insurance Corporation's F hospital

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;