마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Narcotics Control Act;
A. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.
Nevertheless, the defendant will proceed to the pharmacist of the closed pharmacy instead of taking the procedure of transferring or taking over the local mental medicine that is applied to the safe administration of food and drug.
After the words, they thought that they sell to many and unspecified persons via the Internet, such as pentines, pentines, and pentines, which are fluoric mental medicine from pharmacists.
Thus, the Defendant received KRW 72,00 from C to a new bank account used by the Defendant around September 24, 2014, and then sold pentter’s pentter’s pentter’s 70 years from the E convenience store near the Defendant’s residence in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 11:45 on the same day, and from around that time to May 22, 2015, the list of crimes in attached Form
1. In the same manner as the description, she sold or attempted to sell pentines, pentines, pentines, and pentines, a local mental medicine, at least 14 times.
B. On April 24, 2015, the Defendant would return from “G pharmacy” located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F to H, who was kept by the aforesaid pharmacy, to H, such as a local mental medicine medicine (name fing, product name fing, and pent-typeing (name fing, product name fling, etc.).
After the end of the false statement, the above H received 44 mix 44 mix dial, and 40 mix dial, pentine 40 mar.
(c)
On May 20, 2015, at around 09:00, the Defendant administered a medication in a manner of drinking together with water at the office located on the second floor of Songpa-gu Seoul International Building.
2. The Defendant is not a pharmacy founder.
No person other than a pharmacy founder shall sell drugs or acquire them for the purpose of sale.
Nevertheless, the defendant, who acquired prescription in the same manner as above 1-A, had the mind to sell it to many and unspecified people via the Internet.