The defendant is a person who worked as a main kitchen in the "E-cafeteria" operated by the victim D(54 years old) on the second floor of the C Building at o's city.

On May 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had been working as a main kitchen at the above E-cafeteria with the victim FF (the age of 44) working together with the Defendant; (b) had been tightly damaged by the victim F, who was tightly populated from the Defendant’s stairs; (c) had the victim F, for the reason that the victim F was not influenite; (d) had the victim F, who was willing to tightly fluord with the victim; (d) had the victim F, on the ground that the victim F, was not influord with the Defendant; (e) had the victim’s left hand, the victim F, and had the victim take treatment at the victim’s 3rd level; (e) had the victim’s 1/4 lid of gasoline and the victim’s 2nd level of video bluor; and (e) had the victim’s 3rd level of video bluor, which requires treatment between the victim F and the victim’s 3rd.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed a building in which people exist by setting fire, and caused the injury to the victim F, victim G, victim D, and victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to I, J, H, G, D, and F;

1. Each medical certificate and on-site photographs;

1. Investigation reports (as to the confirmation of the place of purchase of gasoline as a suspect), and application of statutes of written expert evidence;

1. The first sentence of Article 164 (2) and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 40 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade are the largest victim F.