When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 17, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 05:50 on September 17, 2020, in the vicinity of the residence of the victim C, which was parked in the front of the said victim’s house, and (b) took a theft of 200,000 won in cash (3 copies and 50,000 won in daily fee) that was kept in the vehicle for the settlement of the container container in front of the said victim’s house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on the spot ctv analysis and data attachment);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, such as imprisonment with prison labor twice for the same thief crime, one-time fine, etc., and recidivism is a disadvantageous sentencing factor. The amount of damage in this case is not so significant, and the defendant's recognition of and reflects the crime in this case shall be considered as favorable sentencing factor. The defendant shall be considered as a favorable sentencing factor. The defendant's punishment against the defendant shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing factors shown in the arguments in this case, including the following circumstances before and after the defendant committed the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime in this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, criminal records, health conditions (which have a intellectual disorder,