However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 8, 2016, at around 20:30, the injured Defendant: (a) tried to drive a freight vehicle parked in the D cafeteria located in the original city, and (b) attempted to restrain the victim’s left side, (c) obstructed the victim; (d) obstructed the victim’s cream; (d) creamed the victim’s cream; (e) creamed the victim’s cream; (e) laid down the victim’s cream; (e) laid down the victim’s cream; and (e) inflicted injury on the victim, such as the victim’s impairment of head part that requires approximately two weeks of treatment on drinking.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time, place, and at the time, place described in the above paragraph (1) above, and at the time, after receiving 112 reports, confirmed the personal information against the Defendant by the police officer belonging to the Hanju Police Station F District of the Kuju Police Station, who called the Defendant. As such, the Defendant took a bath to say, “the age-based flag is a flag,” and took a look at one time, at the left son of the said G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the investigation of police officers' crimes and legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of photographs of suspects and injuries to victims);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and order to attend lectures;

1. Class 1 Crimes (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) (Scope of Recommendation) (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) and the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person who is subject to special sentencing) (the person who is subject to special sentencing).

2. A person who has not been punished for the mitigated area (two months to one year) of Class 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Crimes (Assaults) (Extent of punishment recommended) in general;

3. The scope of the final sentence resulting from the aggravation of multiple offenses.