beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.06.23 2016고단1259

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records” On January 8, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of re-afusing electronic records, etc. at the Daejeon District Court, and was released on September 30, 2014 during the execution of the sentence, and the parole period passed on December 21, 2014.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On April 5, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) 02:42 on a road located in Guri-si, Siri-si; (b) the Defendant stopped while walking along a dong in the E white fluor vehicle while driving on the e white fluor vehicle; and (c) the police officers, etc. belonging to the Guri Police StationF and the police officers, etc. dispatched after receiving a report from 112, who were under the influence of alcohol in the fluor vehicle in return for a request to comply with the measurement of drinking by putting the glass door of the vehicle and fluor; and (d) 2) fluor and police officers from the vehicle “g, f

In order to judge whether the internal body driven a drinking alcohol, and to see the head, the chest side of police officers G was 2,3 times, and the face side of G was flick.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reporting duties by police officers.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place of the foregoing paragraph 1, i.e., the victim G, H, and I, who is a police official, demands the Defendant to take a alcohol test, i.e., the victim, who is a citizen in the surrounding area, i.e., “h., f., f.e., f., f., internal driving

내가 음주 운전한 거 봤느냐고 씨 발 놈들 아, 야, 짭새 새끼야 "라고 욕설을 하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

3. On April 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) while under the influence of alcohol at around 23:30, the Defendant driven an Efluoring vehicle at a section of about 3 km from the Kelto the road located in Guri-siJ to Guri-si D while under the influence of alcohol at around 0.148% during blood transfusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to H and G by the police;

1. Each complaint filed by H, I, and G;

1. A report on detection of a driver at the main place and a report on the situation of the driving at the main place;

1. Data from CCTV images;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: an inquiry about criminal history;