On October 31, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on February 14, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 17, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Port of the Republic of Korea.

1. On January 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20, the E-mail store operated by the victim D, who was employed and worked as an employee of the above convenience store at the time; (b) took cash amounting to KRW 902,120, which is kept in the Defendant’s Treasury for the calculation of the above convenience store by making use of the difference in the victim’s jobs, and stolen it; and (c) in the attached list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, the sum amount of the indictment is approximately KRW 8,896,120, but it is obvious that it is a clerical error, thereby correcting it to be approximately KRW 8,266,120.

The victims' money and valuables were stolen at least six times, such as the statements.

2. Fraud;

A. On February 18, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would return 50,000 won as a honorarium to the victim’s cell phone in the phone with F, the owner of the stolen mobile phone, as shown in attached Table 2, at a place where the location is unknown, as indicated in attached Table 2.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to return the mobile phone even if he has received honorarium from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 50,00 from the victim to the new cooperation account in the name of G on the same day.

B. On February 18, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would return 30,000 won as honorariums to the victim’s victim H, who is the owner of the stolen mobile phone, as shown in attached Table 5, at a place where the location cannot be known.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to return the mobile phone even if he has received honorarium from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.