beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.01.22 2014구단58337

장해등급결정처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 6, 2003, the Plaintiff was a person working at the Busan Regional Police Agency B, and had a meal with his/her home of his/her home located in the same apartment building, and had him/her undergo a medical treatment under the diagnosis of “cerebrovascular” (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”). On January 30, 2012, the injury to the instant injury and disease became final and conclusive on January 30, 2012.

B. After the Plaintiff voluntarily retires on April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability pension against the Defendant on July 7, 2014, and the Defendant rendered the instant disposition on July 17, 2014, stating that the Plaintiff’s disability grade falls under class 7 subparag. 5 of the Plaintiff’s disability grade.

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for an examination with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee on August 27, 2014, but was dismissed on September 25, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2 evidence, Eul 1 and 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s disability status due to the instant injury and disease constitutes class 4 of class 2 (persons who need to be protected from time to time due to a significant disorder in chest long-term function).

Therefore, the instant disposition taken on a different premise is unlawful.

나. 의학적 소견 ⑴ 원고 주치의 ㈎ 2012. 4. 30.자 C병원 진단서 - 병명 : 만성신부전, 혈액투석 - 소견 : 원고는 만성신부전(혈액투석)으로 2012. 1. 30.부터 주 3회 혈액투석을 시작하였고, 향후 평생 동안 지속적으로 투석 치료가 필요할 것으로 판단됨 ㈏ 2014. 7. 25.자 C병원 소견서 - 병명 : 고혈압, 말기 신장병 투석중(혈액투석), 신장 기원의 이차성 부갑상선기능항진증, 전립선의 비대(양성) - 소견 : 말기신부전으로 지속적으로 혈액투석 치료 중인 환자로 향후 평생 의료진의 관리를 받으며 투석 치료를 요함 ㈐ 2014. 8. 19.자 D의원 소견서 - 병명 : 신경인성...