공연음란
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the gist of the grounds for appeal, despite the fact that the defendant publicly committed an obscene act, the court below erred in misconception of facts that found the defendant not guilty.
2. As the judgment of the court below properly states, ① the Defendant was suffering from climinary typology for the old age of 74, and around October 2015, the Defendant was diagnosed to be suffering from climinary typology for the old age of 34, and around January 2018, the symptoms worse, and the Defendant was diagnosed to be suffering from climinary typology for the old age of 74, and the Defendant was diagnosed to have been suffering from climinary typology for the old age of climinology. ② The c) the c) the c) the suffering from climinary typology for the old age of 3) the Defendant’s cargo c) was not open to the public place at around November 22 and 00, ④ the witness at the court of the court of the court below that it was difficult for the Defendant to report the Defendant’s act of obscenity but did not have any possibility of obscenity before climination.
Examining these judgments of the court below closely by comparing them with records, the judgment of the court below is justified.
Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.