beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.11.08 2012고단3346

장물취득등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, for one year, for one year, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on August 19, 2008 by the Daegu District Court for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

[2012 Highest 3346] Defendant A and B derived 2,50,000 won from the market price for the purchase of stolen goods from domestic smartphones being traded in high prices in China. After distributing to the taxi engineers, the name of “Large-gu Gyeong-si, Daegu-do Gyeong-si” was inserted into the Gyeongbuk-gu and Daegu-gu Gyeong-si. The Internet portal site made the above contents on the Internet portal site, advertised it to many unspecified persons, purchased the smartphone from other smartphone distributors, and conspired to sell it to other smartphone distributors for profits.

1. At around 16:00 on February 18, 2012, Defendant B, in the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, with knowledge of the fact that the cost of gallon 1, which is a lost product acquired by K, who is an employee of J-si, was stolen, Defendant B paid KRW 170,000 to the said K and acquired the aforesaid smartphones by receiving the delivery of the said smartphones on its home.

2. From April 2, 2012 to May 31, 2012, Defendants A and B transferred 230,000 won to the said L in advance with knowledge of the fact that “gallon smartphone 1 cost,” a lost product acquired by L, before Central Park on April 2, 2012, Defendant A and Defendant B acquired 25 smartphones by purchasing 23 times smartphones from around that time to around May 31, 2012, with knowledge of the fact that L is a stolen product.

[2012 Highest 5001]

3. The Defendants committed joint crimes by Defendant A and Defendant B committed a theft of smartphone at the M Distribution Center where Defendant A had worked in the past, and Defendant B sold it and conspired to divide the price into two parts.