[2014 Highest 1304]

1. On March 22, 2014, at around 21:00, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance over about 30 minutes by: (a) the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, committed an act threatening to drink with the victim D and the public interest personnel, who are the personnel of the original department and the victim D and the public interest personnel who are engaged in the duties of receipt of the original department, without any reason at the emergency room of the Suwon-gu Suwon-si C Hospital; and (b) the Defendant committed a threat to drinking.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the care and receipt of the victim's hospital by force.

2. Around March 22, 2014, the Defendant insultingd the victim E, a police officer, and civil petitioners in front of the traffic civil petition room at the Suwon Franchisa 199 Suwon Police Station, Suwon Franchisa, 2014. Around March 22, 2014, the Defendant expressed a large amount of about 15 minutes of the victim, such as “Chewing sprink. Chewing sprink. Chewing sprinks without abrue. sprink,” and she expressed a large amount of about 15 minutes of the victim’s public insult.

[2014 Highest 2407] On April 16, 2014, the Defendant destroyed by leaving the front door of the Victim G operation in Suwon-si F, Suwon-si, on the ground that the Defendant did not look at the last door of the Victim G operation, which was in Suwon-si F, on April 16, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 1304]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Written statements prepared in D (2014 Highest 2407);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographic images;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. In light of the fact that the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders have the record of being punished as violent crimes several times, and that the damage has not been recovered, etc., it is not good for the criminal to be committed.

Other degree of damage, age, character and conduct of the defendant.