However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The defendant A has a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C:

A. From June 23, 2012, around 23:00, 23: (a) met with B one-time sexual intercourse from a room in the Damo-gun of Mine-gun, Jeonnam-gun; and (b)

B. At around 16:00 on July 9, 2012, the Emb. B and once sexual intercourse was made between B and B in a room located in the Embel Magu Embel.

C. From July 28, 2012, around 14:00, the Emba-gun Emba-gun Emba-gun, Emba-gun, Emba-gun, with a single sexual intercourse.

2. Defendant B, knowing that he is a spouse of A, had sexual intercourse with A as described in paragraph 1, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that no criminal record exists, Defendant B has no criminal record of the suspended sentence or more, and the defendants reflect