A. Defendant A is a person in charge of overall control over the purchase, management, etc. of computer programs for inside directors of Company B.

누구든지 다른 사람의 프로그램 저작권을 복제하는 방법으로 침해하여서는 아니 됨에도 불구하고, 피고인은 2015. 12. 9. 경 군산시 C 주식회사 B 사무실에서 ( 주) 한글과컴퓨터에서 저작권을 가지고 있는 ＇ 한컴 오피스 2010＇ 프로그램 1개( 정품 가액 244,000원), 오토 데스크 아이엔 씨에서 저작권을 가지고 있는 ＇AutoCAD 2007＇ 프로그램 1개( 정품 가액 5,170,000원 )를 위 회사 컴퓨터에 설치하여 복제한 후, 위 회사 직원들 로 하여금 업무에 사용하게 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant infringed the copyright of the program copyright holder by reproducing two computer program works.

B. Defendant B, a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing automobile export packaging presses, main abandonment, press parts, etc., and Defendant A, a director of the Defendant’s internal company, infringed the copyright of the program copyright holder’s computer program copyright as described in the above paragraph A.

2. We examine the judgment, and the facts charged are crimes falling under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to the main sentence of Article 140 of the Copyright Act. On the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim submitted a written agreement to the effect that the victim would cancel the complaint against the Defendants around September 5, 2016, after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed in entirety pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.