except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B rocketing taxi.

On May 28, 2013, the Defendant driven the above taxi on May 23:45, 2013, and driven the two-lane road in front of the “cultural heritage research institute” located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong along the two-lanes from the outer side to the racing at about 7

There are three-way crossings without signal lights, so the driver has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to check out whether there are pedestrians.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the victim C (the age of 47) who dried the crosswalk on the right side from the left side of the defendant's running direction at a late time, and received the victim as the front part of the passenger car of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to such occupational negligence in the E Hospital located in D on May 29, 2013, around 01:02.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Punishment concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the vehicle of the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, that the victim'