The allegation that the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on dangerous articles in the crime of special injury or by failing to deliberate, is not a legitimate ground for appeal, and it is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it asserted in the grounds of appeal that the Defendant did not use it as a ground for appeal or make it an object

B. Despite examining the record, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine as otherwise alleged by the Defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.