However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 20:30 on March 19, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business, while drinking alcohol in the “F” car page operated by the victim E in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, caused the victim to interfere with the victim’s carcing business by force by following the Defendant’s cryping the table table “at the time of the cryp to the cryp,” making the cryp to the cryp for about 35 minutes, such as taking the cryp to the cryp to the cryp, and taking the cryp to the cryp of the cryp to the cryp of the cryp.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1 of the assault, committed assault on the part below the left shoulder of H by her hand while she tried to leave the police officer to the G Public Security Center located in the Republic of Korea, where E, the owner of a car page, and she was removed from the victim H (the age of 55) who was a customer.

3. On March 19, 2013, the Defendant was arrested of a flagrant offender due to the crime of interference with business, etc. by the police officer I of the Seongbuk Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports from the Kafa as stated in paragraph (1), around 21:05.

The Defendant expressed his desire to “I’s breathy what gushe would have been wrong,” and assaulted to the G Public Security Center located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul at around 21:17 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to E, H and I;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (recording photographs and CCTV);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1), Articles 260 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is disadvantageous to the community service order.