A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

As a speculative game product, no one shall distribute, display, or store the game product the rating classification of which has been refused because it constitutes a speculative game product, and even if it does not engage in the business of exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of the game product, Defendant A promised to operate the illegal game room by sharing each role as an employee who leases the illegal game room, installs and finally settle the game machine, and explains the method of cleaning and managing the game room, and exchanging the customers' hearts.

이후 피고인들은 공모하여 2016. 4. 28.경부터 2016. 5. 11.경까지 서울 성동구 C 지하 1층에서, 게임물등급위원회로부터 등급분류를 받지 않은 “빠찡꼬“ 게임기 24대, “빠찌슬롯” 게임기 8대를 설치하여 그 곳을 찾아오는 손님들의 이용에 제공하고, 위 게임 이용을 통해 획득한 점수에 20%의 수수료를 공제한 금액을 환전을 해주어 등급분류가 거부된 게임기를 이용에 제공하고, 게임물의 이용을 통해 획득한 유무형의 결과물을 환전하는 행위를 업으로 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each statement of D, etc.;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control field photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 4 and 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines;

1. Defendants among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Article 44 (2) of the Promotion of the Game Industry Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act