성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the amount of KRW 10 million, the amount of KRW 80,000, the amount of time to complete a sexual assault treatment program, etc.) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. While the Defendant was not guilty of committing the instant crime by using the first small camera during the period of repeated crime, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant reflects the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s infinite family environment and family relationship; and (c) the Defendant is scheduled to marry to enter into marriage; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, criminal records, occupation, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unjustifiable and thus is unreasonable, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.
3. The appeal by the Prosecutor is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.