When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and B came into the residence of the legal spouse victim C under the law of the defendant's separate living, and came out with air conditioners, human morals, visibility, cleaning apparatus, water purifiers, etc.

The Defendant and B entered the password already known in the locking device (number key method) in the front city of the Defendant’s dwelling in the front city of the Victim, but when the victim was unable to open the locking device password, the Defendant entered the place of residence of the said Victim through a benda window that was not a shot, and the Defendant intruded upon B’s entry into the place of residence of the said Victim through the entrance open by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant and B violated the victim's residence jointly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 2 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;