On October 21, 2010, the Defendant sentenced the Daejeon District Court to imprisonment for a crime of attempted special robbery and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon Prison on December 25, 201.

피고인은 2012. 6. 19. 15:35경 하남시 C커피숍'에서 술에 취하여 이유 없이 옆 테이블에 앉아있던 피해자 D(59세)에게 “야 이 새끼야 뭘 봐 십팔놈아”라고 욕설을 하다가 커피숍 밖으로 나가 그곳 문 밖 계단에 놓여있던 빈 소주병 2개를 양손에 잡고 그 소주병들을 부딪혀서 깨뜨린 뒤 위험한 물건인 깨진 소주병을 들고 다시 커피숍으로 들어가 왼손으로는 피해자의 오른쪽 어깨부분을 잡고 오른손으로는 들고 있던 깨진 소주병으로 피해자의 머리를 때리려고 위협하면서 깨진 소주병을 휘둘러 피해자의 오른팔에 스치게 하여 피해자에게 1주간의 치료를 요하는 오른쪽 팔꿈치 타박상 등을 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, previous records and results of confirmation of dispositions, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the status of personal identification and confinement;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, even though having been punished twice as an injury with a deadly weapon, and that the instant crime was committed even if having been punished twice, and that the Defendant’s strict punishment is not good in light of the applicable law, circumstance, and motive of the instant crime.

However, the punishment shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant reflects and agrees with the victim.