Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a resident of the C apartment at his own city, and the victim D is the chairperson of the above apartment occupant representative.

around April 2015, the Defendant used the above C Apartment 103 Defendant’s residential area with access to computers and uniting program, and the fact that the victim did not notify of the payment of the subsidy and did not obtain written consent to the residents for the construction cost, but the president of apartment occupant representative tried to select an external company and place an order without notifying the representative of the fact that he did not give more than KRW 40 million to the apartment apartment resident repair and painting construction, but did not notify the representative of the fact that the Do-type construction cost was spent more than KRW 124 million and applied for the subsidy, with the written consent of 20,000,000 won that Do-type 124,00,000 won was put in the front door, and then, the Do-type 10,000,000 won was put in the front door with the consent of 20,000 won that the Do-type 36,600,000,000 won was put in the parking lot.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reference materials;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is confirmed as to the date, time, place, and facts in the judgment.