2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On April 2016, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant a supply of construction cost of KRW 90,00 (excluding value-added tax) from the Defendant for the extended design and extension construction of the building located in the Northern-gu, Northern-si, the indoor healthcare interior interior interior and the extension construction of the second floor restaurant (hereinafter “instant construction”).

B. The Plaintiff received a total of KRW 80 million from the Defendant as the construction price of the instant construction project up to now.

C. The Plaintiff commenced the instant construction on May 1, 2016, and currently completed the instant construction.

However, at present, the entire construction of this case is not completed, and approval for use was not granted because data necessary for application for approval for use was not provided.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim for construction cost

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The scope of the instant construction project that the Plaintiff received from the Defendant was as listed in Table 1. The Plaintiff completed the construction project as listed below. In addition, at the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff completed the construction project equivalent to KRW 43,904,00 (value-added tax separate) of the attached Table 2. [Attachment 1. The scope of the instant construction project] 17,000 metal work (Hline) for the 17,000 2,000 2,000 3 basic equipment project (extension 1,272,7274 19,70,700,0000 and 19,700,0000 and 20000,0000 30,000 and 19,70,0000,0000 and 180,0000,0000 square meters and 180,0000 square meters and 281,0814,067,084,0800.