Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. On March 2, 2016, the Defendant drafted a written application with the name “D”, “E”, “E”, “F”, and “D” written in the name column in the name column of the customer information written application for change of the le mobile service kept in the location without D’s consent, for the purpose of uttering at the C agency located in B at the same time on March 2, 2016.

As can be seen, the Defendant forged the “application for the change of Soleh Moble service” in the name of “solide” as a private document regarding the duty of rights.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, exercised a private document on rights and duties by submitting a forged D’s “application for change of Maleh Mmble” service, as set out in paragraph 1, to G employees G who may know of that fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint (including an application for modification to a forged Maleh Moble service)

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;