However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the Seoul Southern District Court due to night building intrusion, larceny, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 1, 2013.

1. On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant, along with C, opened the above high-water door by using the key owned by the victim E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and carried 30,000 won of the market price of the victim’s ownership, using the key owned by the said high-water door door, and carried 1,00,000 won of the market price of the victim.

2. From the end of September 2012, the Defendant conspiredd to steal the property of the victim in the manner referred to in the above paragraph (1) in the above height above, the Defendant laid down one string of weight strings and one strings containing scrap metal, and C carried two strings containing weight strings into Libya by carrying two strings containing weight strings into the victim’s market price of KRW 130,000.

3. At around 18:00 on October 27, 2012, the Defendant, along with the above C, placed 35 km of the old-ri, the market value of which is 140,000,000 won owned by the victim, on the upper garris, and C was placed on the roof by unfolding the bridge, and the Defendant carried the stolen garris with the roof.

As a result, the defendant stolen the victim's property more than three times together with C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. Investigation report (to hear victim E-mail statements);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, previous convictions in disposition, reports on results of investigation, application of Acts and subordinate statutes (suspect A and attachment of judgment);

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the accused is against the obligation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act, and damage.